In Gibbstown, N.J., local contractor Lovett Contracting is facing legal action and potentially stiff fines from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a result of the alleged improper clean-up and removal of asbestos-containing materials used in a former DuPont Chemical gunpowder plant. The lawsuit alleges Lovett was in violation of the federal Clean Air Act and the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants regarding asbestos. The EPA is seeking $32,000 per day and per violation as well as court costs, which can ultimately amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars of violations for the contractor.

According to The Gloucester County Times, the EPA allegations listed six violations, including failure to take required precautions in demolishing or removing about 5,000 feet of piping and 3,000 feet of pipe insulation with dangerous amounts of asbestos that could be exposed to the air. Once airborne, the asbestos becomes a hazard to employees and the local community alike.

While the contractor had no comment to local media, EPA spokesman Elias Rodriguez said, “Asbestos is a known carcinogen, and inhalation of asbestos fibers can cause serious health risks.” He noted, “Using water and equipment such as glove bags and other containment measures prevents the release of asbestos fibers and minimizes the chance of exposure.”

However, high government penalties will not save the lives currently in peril because of this added risk of developing asbestos-related cancers. All these fines can do is punish the offenders. They can not take away the pain, suffering and struggle manymesothelioma and asbestosis victims face on a regular basis. Workers are regularly put at risk during these massive asbestos clean-up projects, with little upfront protection.

Isn’t it time to ban this deadly substance? Join us and help us ban asbestos now.

Asbestos

An AP investigation found that the federal government has known for at least three years that the wood piles contained asbestos, but they did not know the level of contamination.  EPA documents show that in 2007, 20 samples were taken from the pile, four of which showed potentially dangerous asbestos fibers.  The piles came from a now-defunct timber mill that took thousands of trees from a forest affected by asbestos from a nearby mine.

The potential for more contamination has frayed nerves in the town of 3,000 people and further eroded confidence in the government to clean up the mess. Resident Lerah Parker, who has spread truckloads of the material around her property, worries, “We thought we were coming to an end and now we have this issue all over again.” Residents are justified to feel concerned about the public health of their town.  Asbestos is one of the only causes of mesothelioma and, unfortunately, themesothelioma life expectancy can be grim.

Residents aren’t the only ones scrambling at this time. The EPA is now trying to gauge the public health risk and is preparing to issue guidelines about how residents should handle the wood, including warnings not to move or work with the material when it’s dry to avoid stirring up asbestos.  But the agency has decided it won’t track down where the chips went, saying it no longer has jurisdiction because the material is now classified as a commercial product.

Libby has fought an uphill battle against asbestos for many years.  This is not a resting point.  They must continue leading the fight for an asbestos-free country.

Asbestos

According to Boston.com, Danielle and John Bellerose brought the lawsuit against the medical team that tended to the birth of their daughter Katherine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center on June 13, 2004. Katherine was born two months premature and quickly began experiencing health problems and was put in neonatal intensive care.

However, as Katherine’s condition worsened, the team allegedly took too long to diagnose that her bowels had become perforated.

Following an unsuccessful surgery to prevent her intestinal tissues from failing, Katherine passed away on June 21, 2004.

In the lawsuit from the Bellerose family that followed, jurors found that Dr. Janet Lloyd and nurse practitioner Michele Ambrosino were negligent in their care for Katherine and did not treat her appropriately. Jurors awarded Danielle and John $3.5 million each, as well as $50,000 for suffering Katherine experienced before her death.

“By all accounts [Katherine] should have progressed on just like her sister and should have gone on to live a normal life,” said William Thompson, the Bellerose’s attorney. “She lived eight days.”

If you or a loved one have given birth to a child that suffered birth complications that either led to death or permanent injury, there may be legal options worth pursuing. Contact a birth injury attorney at Sokolove Law today to learn more about what types of lawsuit you may be able to bring against the doctors that caused the birth injury.

Birth Injury

Seventy-year-old Frank Bender, a well-known forensic sculptor (or “recomposer of the dead” as he came to be known) passed away from mesothelioma in July after battling the deadly asbestos disease for nearly two years.

Bender became well known throughout the U.S. – and attained local fame in Philadelphia where he was born and raised – following his involvement in the case of John List, a N.J. man who disappeared after killing his family in 1971. A Bender-designed bust of List’s head that reflected what he would look like 18 years after the murders that was used in an 1989 episode of “America’s Most Wanted” that resulted in the murderer’s capture and eventual conviction

“In many ways, Frank’s bust of John List really launched “America’s Most Wanted” into a national force for catching fugitives,” said John Walsh, host of the television show, in 2009, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. “Whenever I get the tough cases, I call Frank.”

Bender likely suffered the asbestos exposure that led to his mesothelioma diagnosis during his years working in the engine room of a navy ship before he began his career as a forensic sculptor.

Bender joins a group of notable public figures who have passed away from mesothelioma, including NFL Hall of Famer Merlin Olsen, Olympic gold medalist Terrence McCann, musician Warren Zevon, actor Steve McQueen, architect Paul Rudolph, and band manager Malcolm McLaren.

Navy veterans who previously worked in naval bases and have now been diagnosed with mesothelioma may be able to bring a mesothelioma lawsuit against companies who manufactured or sold asbestos products that were used on the ships. Contact amesothelioma lawyer in order to learn more about asbestos law and find out if you or a loved one may be able to receive an asbestos settlement.

Mesothelioma

Law360 (subscription required) reports the FDA is being sued for allegedly violating the Freedom of Information Act by failing to fulfill requests for records pertaining to a case against GlaxoSmithKline PLC and other drug companies. The underlying birth injury lawsuit alleges GlaxoSmithKline and other defendants withheld evidence proving that the morning sickness drug caused birth defects. The complaint, filed on behalf of 13 people who were born with severe birth defects, also claims thalidomide was distributed to more than 20,000 people by Smith Kline & French (the predecessor GlaxoSmithKline) despite the fact that the drug never received FDA approval.

If you or a loved one have been affected by medical negligence during the birth of a child, you may want to speak to a birth injury attorney about filing a birth injury lawsuit.

Birth Defects

Thankfully, a pair of new films are attempting to raise awareness regarding the dangers of the asbestos industry and the legal options that individuals have to punish the companies that have harmed them.  The films are already gaining a great deal of attention across the country.

In an attempt to raise awareness regarding the horrors of asbestos, the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO) announced last month that it would be hosting an international livestreaming of the film Breathless on its website on September 26 at 6:30 pm EST. The film, which was directed by Canadian filmmaker Kathleen Mullen, details the death of Mullens’ father that was caused by asbestos exposure in Canadian mines while also addressing the controversy surrounding the Canadian asbestos industry.

“ADAO is thrilled to be able to bring this critical issue to the forefront through the incredible film, Breathtaking. It is through the new avenues of digital technology and social media that we are seeing awareness about asbestos hazards expand rapidly around the globe,” said ADAO Co-Founder Linda Reinstein.

The film will precede a fifteen-minute question and answer session via Twitter with Mullen and Reinstein.

Another film, Hot Coffee, recently premiered on HBO as part of the network’s Summer Documentary Series. The movie looks at American civil justice and tells the story of Stella Liebeck, an elderly woman who sued McDonald’s for money to cover medical costs after the restaurant’s coffee severely burned her. Despite the uproar over the product liability lawsuit filed by Lieback, the film supports the legal action she took.

Many mesothelioma support groups have come out in support of the film, asmesothelioma lawsuits are similar in many ways to the case filed by Liebeck and have come under fire in recent years as well.

Hopefully Breathtaking and Hot Coffee will both help to increase the public’s awareness regarding asbestos and mesothelioma lawsuits.

If you or a loved one has been exposed to asbestos by using certain products or working for certain companies and have subsequently been diagnosed with mesothelioma, there may be legal options worth pursuing to obtain a mesothelioma settlement. Contact a mesothelioma attorney if you have any questions about the details of asbestos law and what is needed to pursue a settlement from the manufacturer of the asbestos product.

Asbestos

The Palm Beach Post reported that Ana Mejia and Rodolfo Santana were awarded the money – half of the $9 million they were originally seeking – to help fund a life plan for their son, Bryan, so he could live a comfortable life for an estimated 70 years. The $9 million plan maps out costs for prosthetics, wheelchairs, medical care, and assisted living needs over that time span.

“Ana and Rodolfo Santana know their mental anguish and their emotions are not important,” said Robert Bergin, the couple’s attorney. “The only thing that will help make up for their mental anguish is to know Bryan’s life plan is fully funded.”

The jury ruled in the couple’s favor after deciding that sonograms taken prior to Bryan’s birth were read incorrectly by doctors and technicians and failed to pick up his disabilities. The couple stated during the trial they would have terminated the pregnancy had they known about Bryan’s disabilities.

While Bryan’s situation is an unfortunate one, it is good to know that thisbirth injury lawsuit will help him pay for any medical costs he needs throughout his life.

If you or a loved one has given birth to a child that now suffers from a birth injury caused by a doctor’s negligence, it may be possible to pursue a birth injury lawsuit. Contact a birth injury lawyer at Sokolove Law today to learn more about your legal options.

Birth Injury

Birth Injury

The 32-year-old Faircloth, a resident of North Carolina, was born withcerebral palsy that affected his arms and legs and had doctors fearing that he would never be able to walk or talk. However, using various treatments and contraptions to exercise his muscles while also feeding his love of playing golf, Faircloth was able to develop his skills and become a scratch golfer.

The development of his golf skills culminated in his recent qualification for the Disabled British Open, which will take place August 15 in England. He is the first American to ever qualify for the event.

Karl Thurber, a golf pro at the country club that Faircloth plays at, said that while Fairchild could use his disabilities as an excuse for any shortcomings, he never has done so.

“Jason has always gone about his merry way as if he has no handicap,” Thurber said. “And he wants to make a difference in his life and in others’ lives. Sometimes people will use convenient excuses for their failures or inadequacies. Jason refuses to do that, not just in golf but in life. He faces the world.”

Jason Faircloth’s story is an inspirational one for any family who has a child dealing with a birth injury such as cerebral palsy. We wish him nothing but the best of luck in the tournament. If you or a loved one have a child who was born with cerebral palsy or other types of birth injury, there may be legal action worth pursuing. Contact Sokolove Law today and speak with one of our experienced birth injury attorneys.

Cerebral Palsy

With references to public concerns various countries have implemented varying de­grees of privacy legislations designed to regulate how companies access and utilize information on potential customers. The United States to date has had a relatively business-friendly, minimal intervention approach encouraging organizationas to provide self-regulated privacy protections. By contrast, the European Union (EU) has taken a pro consumer approach with stringent regulations banning the use of personal information until consent is received (Turner & Dasgupta, 2003). The effective mitigation of privacy issues will improve consumer willingness to shop on the Web, thus improving revenue for online business initiatives and facilitating future growth in the international e-commerce market place. Information technology will continue to redefine organizational practices and business models with respect to privacy (Payton, 2001). Research conducted by Straub and Collins provides a comprehensive discussion of the privacy implications of unauthorized access to personal information resulting from a security breach (Straub & Collins, 1990).

For more information on Carrier IQ Lawsuit: follow us on our RSS Feeds.

The advent of mainframe data processing in the 1960s provided mostly large or­ganizations with a means to obtain, store, and manipulate information in a central­ized manner that up until that time was not possible (Westin, 1967). As mainframe computer technology was assimilated into mainstream business and governmental organizations, users of the technology began exploiting the massive computing and storage capabilities to create databases of information on individuals, much of it considered personal. The explosive growth of the multibillion dollar direct marketing industry, for example, was facilitated by the availability of large com­mercial databases compiled from the public information, including motor vehicle and real estate records, telephone and other directories, or from responses supplied by consumers on warranty cards and other surveys (Turner & Dasgupta, 2003). The new capabilities also allowed profiles of individuals to be created to assist firms in credit decisions. The resultant public anxiety led to the passage of the Fair Credit Reporting Act in 1970 and the Privacy act of 1974, which defined the rights of in­dividual citizens and outlined the U.S. Government’s responsibility for protecting the personal information it maintains (Davis, 2000).

Information from other sources on Carrier IQ Lawsuit:

Continued technological evolvements in the mid-to-late 1980s, including the per­sonal computer, workstations, and communications networks, enabled even broader diffusion of database management, marketing, and telemarketing tools. Individuals and small organizations now had the computing capability to manipulate and store information that before required access to a mainframe. Further, new networking capabilities provided the ability to more easily distribute and share information with other organizations and individuals (Turner & Dasgupta, 2003). The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECP) of 1986 prohibited unauthorized interception and alteration of electronic communications and made it illegal for online services to disclose personal information without a warrant. The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection (CMPP) Act of 1988 regulated the use of computer matching of fedral records subject to the Privacy Act except for legitimate statistical reason (Davis, 2000). A 1992 survey indicated that 76 percent of the public felt they had lost control over how information about them was circulated and used by business organizations (Louis, 1992).

Unlike law enforcement investigations (as opposed to secret police monitoring), launched only after crimes have been committed, wholesale monitoring of Internet usage is done before any illegal act occurs (Caloyannides, 2003).

Continued advances in information technology in general, and the growth of Internetworking technologies specifically, further facilitate the collection, distribution, and use of personal information. Due to increasing Web users day by day people have also started raising concerns while doing online transactions over the Internet. A 1998 survey examining scenarios and privacy preferences suggests that Web users can be statistically clustered into three primary groups based on their attitudes and privacy (Ackerman, Cranor, & Reagle, 1999). Privacy fundamentalists (17 percent) are described as unwilling to provide any data to Web sites and are very concerned about any use of data. The pragmatic majority (56 percent) are concerned about data use but could be made comfortable by the presence of privacy protection measures such as laws and privacy policy statements, and the remaining respondents (27 percent) are categorized as marginally concerned (Turner & Dasgupta, 2003). Similar results from a separate study conducted in Germany in 2000 not only identify the privacy fundamentalists (30 percent) and the marginally concerned (24 percent), but also describe two distinct subgroups within the middle tier delineated as identity concerned (20 percent) and profiling averse (25 percent) (Grimm & Rossnagel, 2000).

Our use of the term or terms Carrier IQ Lawsuit: is for descriptive purposes only. There is no relationship between the owners of this website and the maker of the product discussed in this post. Our use of the words Recall, Class Action Lawsuit and other similar words related to an event do not necessarily mean that this event has occurred. Refer to the website of the United States Food and Drug Administration for information on drug or medical device recalls. If a Class Action Lawsuit is formed in relation to the product discussed in this post we will provide that information at the time the Class Action is formed. A Class Action Lawsuit is not required to exist for you to file a lawsuit if you have been injured by the product discussed in this post.

To keep up to date on Carrier IQ Lawsuit: visit our site often.

Carrier IQ Lawsuit