Generally speaking, a negligent action is recklessness that results in personal injury to another person. It might be an act, like recklesslessly knocking a rock off a rooftop, or a failure to take action, like a landlord who doesn’t repair a worn out step. A negligent action frequently provides the basis for personal injury cases.
To file a legal case for negligent conduct, the injured party (the man or woman filing the personal injury lawsuit) will need to demonstrate four elements: That the negligent party (the man or woman or entity being sued) owed the injured party a duty of reasonable care; that the accused failed to use due care towards the injured party (i.e. breached the duty); that the defendant’s breach of duty caused the plaintiff’s an injury; and that the injured party suffered damages as a final result.
Duty of reasonable care: The injury victim needs to demonstrate that the defendant had a duty of due care toward the injured party. Somebody has a duty to avoid causing an injury to another if a reasonable man or woman in the same scenario could foresee that an act (or failure to take action) might lead to harm. Some scenarios are very clear. We all know that somebody could be injured if we run a red light, so we have a duty of reasonable care to follow traffic laws and signals. Other cases are more tricky. If a property owner has a private swimming pool in a fenced yard, does he have a duty to prevent a neighbor child from climbing the fence and accidentally drowning in the pool? How much care would a reasonable person take in that scenario? In each instance, the factors surrounding the injuries play an essential role in determining whether or not a negligent party had a duty of due care towards the injured party.
Breach of Duty: The injured party has to demonstrate that the negligent parties failed to carry out their duty of due care. For example, an ordinary person could foresee that a car full of explosives could explode, so someone who parks such a vehicle in a populated parking lot has breached the duty of care to the other men and women nearby. If the vehicle blows up, the driver might be guilty of negligence. A person could also foresee that a car that isn’t repaired adequately may malfunction, so if the brakes on a poorly maintained car fail and the car hits a child, the owner of the car may have breached the duty of due care to that child. Each car owner has a duty to maintain the car in a reasonably safe condition. Alternatively, if the owner regularly maintains and repairs the car and the brakes failed because the brakes were faulty or the mechanic made a mistake, the owner did not breach a duty of due care, though the brake manufacturer or the mechanic might be liable.
Result in: The injured party has to demonstrate that the negligent persons breach of duty brought on the injuries for which the injury victim is suing. Sometimes causation is straightforward. If you run a stop light and hit a pedestrian, you plainly caused the harm. If the pedestrian’s elderly mother has a heart attack and dies when she hears of her daughter’s injury, did you lead to that injury? Not likely, but those are the kinds of problems that have to be solved in a negligence legal action. There could also be concerns about what harm was caused by an accident. People today frequently have more than one accident in their lives, so if a person has had two prior back injuries, precisely what injury to the back was caused by the most recent fall down a flight of stairs?
Damages: Damages in a negligent conduct lawsuit try to put the injury victim in the same position he or she would be in if the accident hadn’t happened. A injured party needs to prove the monetary value of his or her injuries. For example, if a person is disabled and can no longer work, a calculation of damages would consider the profession of the plaintiff and the amount he or she would have earned during the time left in a normal working career. Damages would also include medical expenses and estimated costs for medical treatment, special accommodations, and assisted living.
In some scenarios defendants are accountable for negligence because of the operation of law, and not because they specifically caused an accident. For instance, since an employer is held responsible for injuries caused by employees during work, UPS may be liable if a UPS driver has an accident while making deliveries. A hospital could be held at fault for injury caused by only one nurse. Plaintiffs often make claims against several negligent parties to make sure there will be enough assets (money) to pay a judgment.
If you’ve been the victim of a serious car accident in Baltimore, you need the advice of an experienced Maryland personal accident lawyer. Talk to a local Maryland personal accident lawyer about your options.